Citizen Kane Power and Faliure essays

Citizen Kane Power and Faliure essays Citizen Kane, it gives us the kind of central character we are immediately interested in; given Welles' opening newsreel montage, Kane is interesting simply because he has to be. No one who led such a life could possibly have been boring; he was a powerful man who lost everything, and that fascinates us for the same reason it fascinates the reporters in the film we don't understand how it could have happened, how Kane could have fallen so far. He seems to befuddle everyone who knew him, exactly in the mold of most Shakespearean heroes: There was Hamlet, Lear, Macbeth, and now there is Charles Foster Kane. He is a Great Man, probably the closest 20th-century America could come to royalty, and that's also part of what makes him fascinating; a small man who falls from grace is of no consequence, which is why Shakespeare never wrote about Hamlet, the plumber of Denmark, or Othello, the hot-dog vendor of Venice. Kane was a king of his time, a man who seemingly had everything, and felt un fulfilled just the same. Citizen Kane explores that conundrum. It puts us in the shoes of a deliberately faceless reporter, Jerry Thompson (William Alland, in a thankless-yet-critical role), attempting to discover what it was that made Kane tick. His official task is to find the meaning to Kane's final word: Rosebud. The word is, in many ways a Macguffin until the end of the film, its only purpose is to move Thompson forward in questioning Kane's friends and associates. The people he talks to are exactly the kind of people we find as supporting characters in Shakespeare's plays. Kane has his Claudius, Thatcher (George Coulouris), the man who ripped him away from his parents and tried to raise him on money alone; his Horatio, the harried Bernstein (Everett Sloane), who remains loyal to the end, but knows he cannot do justice to his friend's legacy; his Banquo, Jed Leland (the wonderful Joseph Cotten), forever bound and determined to be Kane's conscien...

Arguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)

Arguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS) Free Online Research Papers Many arguments are put forward by Leon R. Kass to continue criminalizing physician assisted-suicide, stating that it is wrong for a doctor to ever harm a patient, yet is the terminally ill patient quality of life worthwhile when they are is reduced by being feeble and in pain? Two ethical principles support ending prohibition: The right to control ones own body and the physicians duty to relieve suffering. A lot of weight is placed on the Hippocratic Oath which states not to do harm. Kass asserts that allowing physicians to help with suicide would overstep their limitations and literally have a license to kill. This is both illogical and inciting. The author and bioethicist Dieterle argues that discontinuing life-sustaining systems is considered acceptable by society, yet this is a more definitive act by a physician than prescribing a medication that a patient has requested who can decide whether to take it or not, as he or she sees fit (Dieterle 129). Rather than characterizing physician-assisted suicide as murder, people should see it as bringing the dying process to a merciful end, or as Oregon calls it, â€Å"death with dignity.† Bioethicist and journalist, Boer, agrees that a physician who complies with a plea for final release from a patient facing death under unbearably painful conditions is doing the patient good, not harm, and â€Å"his or her actions are entirely consonant with the Hippocratic tradition† (Boer 530). There is an argument made by Kass that that permitting physician-assisted suicide would undermine the patient-doctor relationship. This is flawed reasoning because patients are not lying in bed wondering if their physicians are going to kill them. â€Å"The lethal dosage is only prescribed on request of the patient and on no other terms† (Manning 5). Rather than undermining a patients trust, it should be expected that the legalization of physician-assisted suicide would enhance that trust. Many people feel that they would have a greater sense of security knowing they are able to trust their physicians to provide such help in the event of unbearable suffering. It is also argued by Kass that it cannot be regulated in the sense that people with mental illness, comatose, or with depression will be able to get the prescription through proxy or when they are incompetent, but it is reported by Iwasaki that in every state which has legalized it, there have been strict regulations which requires at least a month and a competency hearing. Washington and Oregon have specified that assistance be given only to a patient who is competent and who requests it (Iwasaki 2). Therefore it has been shown that it can be regulated and it is not understandable that new states would not follow these standards. A study carried out a few years ago by the University Of Washington School Of Medicine queried 828 physicians (a 25 percent sample of primary care physicians and all physicians in selected medical subspecialties) with a response rate of 57 percent. Of these respondents, 12 percent reported receiving one or more explicit requests for assisted suicide, and one-fourth of the patients requesting such assistance received prescriptions (Rogatz 12). A survey of physicians in San Francisco treating AIDS patients brought responses from half, and 53 percent of those respondents reported helping patients take their own lives by prescribing lethal doses of narcotics (Rogatz 13). Every state also does terminal sedation. Clearly, requests for assisted suicide cant be dismissed as rare occurrences. There is no perfect solution to this problem. However, there are reasonable protections which can minimize the risk of abuse and help the greater good of people. All physicians are bound by the oath not to do any harm, but we must recognize that it isn’t harmful only to hurt them, but to refuse an act of mercy. Thus, helping out people should be recognized as a humanitarian act, and not be considered criminal. Boer, T A. â€Å"Recurring Themes in the Debate about Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide.† Journal of Religious Ethics 35.3 (2007): 529-555. Dieterle, J M. â€Å"Physician Assisted Suicide: A New Look at the Arguments.† Bioethics 21.3 (2007): 127-139. Georges, J, B. D. â€Å"Relatives’ Perspective on the Terminally Ill Patients who Died After Euthanasia or Physician-Assisted Suicide: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Interview Study in the Netherlands.† Death Studies 31.1-15 (2007). Iwasaki, J. â€Å"Oregon Assisted Suicide at Record High: Washington Discussing Rules for its New Law.† Seattle Post-Intelligencer (Jan. 2009). 13 Jan. 2009 . Manning, M. â€Å"Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Killing or Caring?† Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press. Rogatz, Peter. The Virtues of Physician-Assisted Suicide. Humanist (Nov.-Dec. 2001). 22 Jan. 2009 . Research Papers on Arguments for Physician-Assisted Suicide (PAS)The Fifth HorsemanCapital PunishmentComparison: Letter from Birmingham and CritoInfluences of Socio-Economic Status of Married MalesGenetic EngineeringThe Relationship Between Delinquency and Drug UsePersonal Experience with Teen PregnancyBook Review on The Autobiography of Malcolm XThree Concepts of PsychodynamicRiordan Manufacturing Production Plan

FIN Unit 4 DB SA FWP Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

FIN Unit 4 DB SA FWP - Essay Example Not only do the institution helps you to borrow capital, but also working with you to plan for the future as well as assure potential customers of the businesss steadiness and trustworthiness (Deshpande, 2004). Some banks offer incentives to keep a certain amount deposited besides others offer services to make the most of your profits, it might be wise to think through a bank that can offer those services (Deshpande, 2004). Certain institutions can even assist you collect financial information in your industry internationally. Or else, you would be wise to enlist a liberated financial advisor to identify your needs before choosing a global bank. Majority of those categories of banks provides the best tax rates which is less than the standard United States banks. Additionally, the interest rate charged on (for instance the Euro dollar deposits) depends on the bank’s lending rate, because the interest a bank earns on loans regulates its willingness as well as ability to pay interest on deposits, and finally on rates of return accessible on United States money market instruments (Massey, 2004). There is a wide range of investments policies capitalize on rewards not offered outside of an Investor’s home country. More frequently than not, there are no scarcities of money-markets as well as bond funds provided by banks out of the United States (Massey, 2004). The rewards of banking outside the U.S. also encourage a better investment atmosphere that appeals clients. An extra contribution to banking that way is the confidentiality that your money is safe (Stewart, 2011). However, the structured rules allow disclosures to prevent occurrence of money laundering and other unlawful activities. The Governments tend to be less harsh when regulating securities denominated in foreign currencies, since the bonds’ purchasers are generally more and most